{"id":535,"date":"2011-10-03T15:49:51","date_gmt":"2011-10-03T14:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blog.moveadminister.co.uk\/?p=535"},"modified":"2025-07-24T10:23:57","modified_gmt":"2025-07-24T09:23:57","slug":"mssql-what-exactly-does-it-mean","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.moveadminister.co.uk\/?p=535","title":{"rendered":"MSSQL – What Exactly Does It Mean?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"MicrosoftWell as per our Press Release \u00e2\u20ac\u201c September 2011<\/a><\/strong>, MSSQL<\/strong> will provide increased stability, portability and more importantly speed. Speed is something we have been testing of late and we would like to share our results with you.<\/p>\n

We took a client\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s activity audit data file comprising of 423,189<\/strong> records for more than a single trading company and ran the following tests which returned data from all fields with in the file:<\/p>\n

Test 1
<\/strong>Return all accounting activity for the year 2010.
\nClarion returned 75,608 records in 9 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 75,608 records in 1 second!<\/p>\n

Test 2
<\/strong>Return all accounting activity for the year 2010, but for a single trading company.
\nClarion returned 21,651 records in 7 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 21,651 records in 1 second!<\/p>\n

Test 3
<\/strong>Return all sales accounting activity for the year 2010, but for a single trading company.
\nClarion returned 13,518 records in 6 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 13,518 records in 0 seconds!<\/p>\n

Test 4
<\/strong>Return all records.
\nClarion returned 413,459 records in 56 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 413,459 records in 9 seconds!<\/p>\n

\nI\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m sure you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll agree that MSSQL<\/strong> has returned some pretty impressive times, but we would just like to end this snippet of information by stating all tests were ran over our network \u00e2\u20ac\u201c which makes MSSQL<\/strong> very impressive indeed, especially as no fine tuning has been done!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"MicrosoftWell as per our Press Release \u00e2\u20ac\u201c September 2011<\/a><\/strong>, MSSQL<\/strong> will provide increased stability, portability and more importantly speed. Speed is something we have been testing of late and we would like to share our results with you.<\/p>\n

We took a client\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s activity audit data file comprising of 423,189<\/strong> records for more than a single trading company and ran the following tests which returned data from all fields with in the file:<\/p>\n

Test 1
<\/strong>Return all accounting activity for the year 2010.
\nClarion returned 75,608 records in 9 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 75,608 records in 1 second!<\/p>\n

Test 2
<\/strong>Return all accounting activity for the year 2010, but for a single trading company.
\nClarion returned 21,651 records in 7 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 21,651 records in 1 second!<\/p>\n

Test 3
<\/strong>Return all sales accounting activity for the year 2010, but for a single trading company.
\nClarion returned 13,518 records in 6 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 13,518 records in 0 seconds!<\/p>\n

Test 4
<\/strong>Return all records.
\nClarion returned 413,459 records in 56 seconds.
\nMSSQL returned 413,459 records in 9 seconds!<\/p>\n

\nI\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m sure you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll agree that MSSQL<\/strong> has returned some pretty impressive times, but we would just like to end this snippet of information by stating all tests were ran over our network \u00e2\u20ac\u201c which makes MSSQL<\/strong> very impressive indeed, especially as no fine tuning has been done!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-move-administer","category-the-future"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t